The Anglican Advent Collect

 

“ALMIGHTY God, give us grace that we may cast away the works of darkness, and put upon us the armour of light, now in the time of this mortal life, in which thy Son Jesus Christ came to visit us in great humility; that in the last day, when he shall come again in his glorious majesty to judge both the quick and the dead, we may rise to the life immortal, through him who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Ghost, now and ever.” Amen.

 

The Collect quoted above is the Collect for the First Sunday in Advent. It may well be the work of the Blessed Thomas Cranmer, Christian Martyr, Protestant, Archbishop of Canterbury and author of the first and second publication of the Anglican Rite’s Book of Common Prayer. I consider Thomas Cranmer a Reformation Saint, whose coerced recantations of the Protestant Church in England during the reign of Mary Tudor, Queen of England, fully inform us of his humanity, his weakness and sinfulness. Who then cannot but be moved at the words of his Confession and declaration from a temporary “pulpit” in the University Church of St. Mary the Virgin Church, Oxford, on the day of his execution.

Finally released from all pretense, from all vanity, from oaths of service and loyalty to the “Bloody” Roman Catholic Usurper and her cowering Court, finally discharged from all vows of fealty and discipline to the corrupt and fallen Roman Catholic Pope, Julius III,  finally clothed in simple, unadorned robes such as Christ’s disciples might have worn, finally facing his death and the certain judgment of God Almighty, finally with no hope of earthly breath left, he choose to proclaim the righteousness of the Reformation, the fallacy of the Roman Catholic Church, the apostasy of the Pope.

He condemned his right hand for the recantations he had previously written, and vowed it should burn first in his fiery burning at the stake that was to follow. He died proclaiming his love of Christ, “Lord Jesus receive my spirit,” and saw heaven open before him. This was the death of a Martyr, a Saint, a Protestant, and an Englishman.

It is not surprising, therefore, that the Advent Collect celebrates the final “Glorious Last Day,” not the First Day, the Day of Conception, as God and Woman conceive life, and quicken within Mary’s womb the humanity of the Son of God, Jesus. Nor does it even mention the coming Day of Birth of the Son of Man, when the Miracle of the Virgin Birth brings forth into the world the Son of God, the Christ, Jesus.

Understand, I love the Book of Common Prayer, and worship with it daily; it is the font of my sacramental grace, the guide to my life of worship. But it is, as is almost all Christian literature of the past two millennia, focused on end times, on eschatology, not on incarnality, not on the Incorporeal Manifestation of Flesh, the Divine Act of God becoming Man.

 

The four weeks of Advent seem such a short time to focus on the Incarnation and Nativity of Jesus. Should not Advent be the longest season, the most joyful event, and the holiest, most worshipful time of a Christian’s life? Unlike Lent, a time of somber reflection on our sins and the “full, perfect, and sufficient sacrifice, oblation, and satisfaction” of Jesus Christ necessary for Divine Forgiveness, Advent should celebrate New Life given by God, renewing the Old Covenant, creating a New Covenant, broadening, deepening, entwining the historical and scripturally revealed ADONAI with all mankind. The birth symbolizes not only the incomprehensible act of God becoming Man, but of humanity realizing what it is to become, in the most profound fashion, like God. Faith, Hope and Charity, Unconditional Love, all these gifts come to us through the Incarnation, through Christ’s birth, not through His crucifixion and death.

I preach this because I find the act of humility much more difficult than the act of sacrifice; that God should become Man is far more inspiring to me than that Jesus should sacrifice himself for mankind. I thank God for His gift of everlasting life, but I can not touch nor experience the ethereal realm. I live in the world of flesh and bones, of imperfection and weakness, but I know that this world of the flesh was inexorably changed at the very moment described in Luke 1:35 ” The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God”

At that very instant, the promise of Adam and Eve was realized, the state of “original” sin which their act created was dissolved. Man, born evil in sin was transformed into man born innocent, free of sin. The Little Child of the Nativity was born guileless and guiltless, an innocent. Who will argue that an infant today is born in sin? Who would ascribe evil to the children the Lord Jesus gathered to himself, and held up as models of God’s children, models of how we should approach our Father in Heaven?

In the Holy Nativity, we see man returned to innocence. No longer is man compelled to choose Good from Evil, now, sinless at conception and birth, man may choose good or evil, the very same choice God gave to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.

In this Advent Season, I ask all Christians that I meet: What if there was no promise of Eternal Life, what if all the time you are allowed was just your life as you live it today? Would not the day of Christ’s Birth still be the greatest day in the history of humanity? Would you love God less if his only gift was the Grace that has enriched your life, the Goodness and Loving-Kindness that He drew out of the hardened hearts of all mankind, the charity, the wisdom, the love that has enriched all our lives since the moment of His conception?

The Incarnation of God becoming Man, not appearing as a man, not manifested in human form for a day, not perceived as a vision, but in the flesh, in the days and nights, weeks and months of thirty three years; in every way, every limb, every organ, every cell, human. This is our lesson that Jesus as a human, as a Man, with free will, could live in obedience to his Father, could live in love and worship of his Father, every day of his life.

For me, the Incarnation is a most profoundly personal experience. It is the sine qua non of all Christian experience, and the sanctification of this Advent Season, commemorating the conception and birth of Jesus is sadly overlooked in emphasis in both Liturgy and Life.

Posted in Religious Thought, Sermons and Homilies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Anglican Advent Collect

He is coming!

It is the First Sunday in the Liturgical Season of Advent. It is the First Day of the  Anglican Christian Liturgical Year. Light the first Purple Candle of your Advent wreath, Hallelujah! His Incarnation is the hope of mankind! Hallelujah!

Isaiah 11: 6-8

The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.
And the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox.
And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp, and the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice’ den.

“…and a little child shall lead them” Holy Christ’s Birth! Holy Christ’s Mass! Merry Christmas to All in this, His, season!

Posted in Religious Thought, Sermons and Homilies | Tagged , , | Comments Off on He is coming!

Really, Senator Paul? An Amendment to do… what?

Good Golly! Would any Republican care to comment on Senator Rand Paul’s campaign to pass a:

Constitutional Amendment that would preclude senators and representatives from passing laws that don’t apply equally to U.S. citizens and Congress, the executive branch and the Supreme Court.

Really…that’s the most important Constitutional issue that Senator Paul can imagine?

Consider these Amendments, more important than:

A Balanced Budget Amendment? Four year required and submitted budgets concurrent with the second, third, fourth and first years of Presidential Terms.

A Term Limit Amendment? … say Two President, Three Senate and Nine House consecutive terms…

An Amendment to Repeal The Seventeenth Amendment? … its passage would return to the Sovereign States the political wherewithal to enforce the intent of the Tenth Amendment.

A Federal Election and Campaign Contribution Amendment? … limiting Federally Regulated Media (Cable, Radio, Airwaves) candidate campaign advertising to 90 days prior to election day, and limiting the amount that can be spent, not contributed, to a fixed amount for each separate Presidential, Senate and House campaign. It would allow the balance of contributed funds to be remitted to the General Funds of the Separate Sovereign States…

A Free Speech Amendment? … clearly defining the Founder’s purpose of the First Amendment, to allow and protect all “Non Commercial” Public and Political Speech, and allowing the prosecution of those who promulgate Obscene material and Pander to Perverse, Degenerate and Malignant Behavior for commercial purposes…

A Freedom of Religion Amendment?… to allow any citizen, individually, corporately and while in any government employment, to state their beliefs, act lawfully upon those beliefs, and refuse coercion of any nature to violate those beliefs. Essentially a “Conscientious Objector,” it would also allow public displays of a “religious nature” in and on all public lands, or the absence thereof, and public prayer of a “religious nature” in and on all public lands, including schools, and allow the absence thereof, by any individual, corporation or government entity…

A Right of Association Amendment?... prohibiting any Governmental entity from outlawing discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other public and private accommodations whether engaged in interstate commerce, or not…

An Interstate Commerce Amendment?… clearly defining the term, and its applications, limits and remedies under Federal Law…

An Amendment to Repeal the 16th Amendment? … and allow Congress to proportionally by population levy annually against each Sovereign State an amount necessary to fund the Federal Government. Each State would then decide the proper and preferred method of taxation of its citizens to raise the amount required by the levy, with full enforcement powers necessary there to…

An Ex Post Facto Remediation Amendment?… an Amendment which would prevent any remedy at law to be applied to a present citizen population based on the malfeasance of a past citizen population. If the cause of action occurred prior to time in which remedy is sought, and there is no preponderance of evidence to suggest the malfeasance continues, then no remedy may be adjudicated.

An Amendment to repeal the Nineteenth Amendment?… Equality under the law, yes; the right to vote, no! Men can’t have babies, women can’t have votes. After all, the Suffrage Movement promulgated propaganda informing mankind that allowing woman the vote would improve the conditions of mankind, and create a more civil and harmonious body politic. Hah! More humans and particularly more Americans have died from the causes of war, poverty, disease and crime since the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment than in all our previous American History and indeed, in mankind’s previous history since Creation!  This amendment might be difficult to pass, but is severely needed.

I submit that Senator Paul is posturing for votes, or electioneering, and is competing for the national press attention given some other Republican Senators.

If Republicans Senators had any character they would stand up and demand the Nation be allowed to vote, up or down, on a Balanced Budget Amendment. Apparently the only “Boxer” in the Senate doesn’t wear them, and also has no character, and, worse, is a Democrat from the Left Coast.

So my friends from Lincoln’s party, What think you of Senator Paul’s proposal?

Note: This article will be published in an essay on bullsullivan.com with amended notes and expanded commentary as soon as I set the table, prepare and cook a three course meal, seat and serve my mother, carry on pleasant conversation with her and attend to her dining needs, finish our supper, clean off the table, do the dishes and pans, clean and straighten out the kitchen and turn off the lights. All tasks of which are traditionally feminine gender roles, but my mother is Ninety Three, so I willingly do, I might add, very well, what so many women complain of doing, do poorly, or do not at all. “Let’s get the kids a Happy Meal from McDonald’s or we can microwave some chicken nuggets for dinner…”

A Republican Responds:

Bull, maybe there are a lot of things under that umbrella of his amendment.. seems those in Congress have a whole lot of privilege. You should ask him.

You miss my point. Passing a Constitutional Amendment is at best a difficult process, and at worst, impossible. Two thirds in both Houses of Congress, Thirty Eight States, a time limit… Why would anyone distract fellow American’s from the absolutely necessary Amendment to Balance the Budget, and limit debt? Nothing else proposed by anyone over the past fifty years would have the same salubrious effect, and the National Government will never be limited in size, scope of influence and power until the spendthrifts in DC are curbed! The purse is absolute power!

Senator Rand Paul is yet another hubristic wonder, thinking that he can change the system from within, and not risking his position, his election, by speaking out plainly against waste, fraud and a total lack of budgetary control by the Congress. He rationalizes, as so many do, “I have to be re-elected to do any good…I am more valuable to the conservative cause here than if I say what needs to be said and lose an election…” What a load of crock…

Senator Cruz put his money where his mouth is, and no one in the Republican Party rallied to his aid. Now, I don’t think he is the brightest lamp in the room, but until these boys begin to act like men, and do what has to be done, well, the slide toward the tipping point of hedonism and fascism will continue.

As a Christian Minister, I firmly believe that it is G-d’s Will being done, just as was done by “good Jews” nice men, priests high and low, and wealthy nobles, in Isaiah and Jeremiah, when they just couldn’t give up the ostensible rewards of Idolatry, to accept the discipline of G-d.

JER 2:8 The priests said not, Where is the Lord? and they that handle the law knew me not: the pastors also transgressed against me, and the prophets prophesied by Baal, and walked after things that do not profit.

Quoting the Holy Scriptures is not politically correct, and even when using more modern textual translations, we don’t hear the Lord’s voice in any of these Congressmen who serve mammon, not G-d. We are a nation corrupted by idols and false gods, and we will fall. Only prayer will save us, and then only if the Lord anoints one man to stand up righteous in G-d and speak the truth…and an Amendment like Senator Paul proposes is a waste of time and political capital. Believe me, it is not WWJD, but what would He have me do, and few, if any, are asking that question.


A second response from the same Republican:

Well, when you put it that way… . I do agree. I like Cruz very much as you might have noticed, mostly because he, although just a man, seems willing to stand for his principals.

One final note, they are not Senator Cruz’s principles, they are G-d’s, revealed to man in the Holy Scriptures. Stewardship, caring for the gifts of G-d to the people of G-d, for every thing we have is from the Father… I do believe that Senator Cruz also believes this; good men must rally around him and encourage others to speak as he does…as he says he does for the 27 million Texans, and as I hope, for the one true Almighty G-d! There are no compromises between Heaven and Hell, it is one way or the other, no one can serve two masters, and yet so many in Congress attempt to serve hundreds…

Another Republican Response:

Bull Sullivan is a Christian Minister? Holy …

Not to worry, I am a terrible minister, and do very little harm to the Gospel. On top of that, I am an unchurched Anglican, my ordinate passed away years ago, and as such am a member of the least “modern” protestant high church, what with our deep and abiding Anglican affection for the archaic 1928 Book of Common Prayer, and our love of the King James Version of The Holy Bible. I hope this reassures you that Christ’s Church is in good hands, that is, in someone else’s! I spend too much time marveling at G-d’s creation and reading His Word, oh yes, and praying to be a threat to get out and obsess over the “social gospel.” I strongly believe that:

G-d is Good, G-d does Good, we do His Good, or we do no Good at all.

The Republican responds:

Not too worried. I figure I can screw up until I reach my Death Bed. Convert to Catholicism at the last minute, and I’m clear.

Hey, that worked for Constantine, or so Roman Catholic Scholars say. My view on this is that I hope it turned out better for him that it did for the Roman Empire…Rome was sacked soon thereafter, and the Western Empire fell with a thud into the long lasting “Dark Ages”… and who really cares about the Eastern Empire, although it and its excesses lasted in various forms until the fall of Constantinople in 1453.

The first Republican responder comments:

Speaking of the Book of Common Prayer.. Bull, did I ever tell you about my husband’s family? …his 11th Great Grandfather is the Archdeacon Edmund Cranmer.. brother of Thomas Cranmer the Archbishop of Canterbury and author of said book? Long history in Husbands family of Preachers.. some you might have hear of… My side had some preachers too, just not famous ones.

All true preachers of the Gospel are famous… to G-d! You have mentioned your husband’s relationship with Saint Thomas Cranmer…take that Saint Thomas Moore!!! You are related to him as I am related to Rowland Taylor, by marriage. My son counts himself ( not really, he doesn’t seem to impressed) with being a direct descendant of Saint Rowland, martyred by Bloody Queen Mary in 1555, the year before Saint Thomas was martyred by the same Roman Catholic Queen. Thankfully, the Queen died in 1558, and we are spared the ignominy of speaking Spanish in the English Colonies, and worshiping the Pope, Long Live Elizabeth I, Long Live the Reformation!

Now, lets consider, in view of  the debate over the “religious” intent of the Founding Fathers, and the inclusion of religious belief in politics therefrom, the most important line of text that you, or any Political Scientist, or Christian Theologian, or Politician, progressive or conservative, will read in this article, and perhaps, in your entire study of the History and Systems of American Governance:

G-d is Good, G-d does Good, we do His Good, or we do no Good at all.

Think about this text.

Is it substantially contained in the Holy Scriptures?

Pray about it.

Is it commanded that we live according to the demand of this text?

Consider the Founding Fathers, consider George Washington?

Did he understand this text, and live a life of example and obedience to the demand, we do His good or we do no good at all.

+ + +

More coming, see my next comment this week:  On the role of Religion in Making Government Policy Decisions.

 

 

Posted in FACEBOOK ADHOMS, National Politics, Religious Thought, Sermons and Homilies | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Really, Senator Paul? An Amendment to do… what?