Commentary 2013: Week Two: A Letter from Bull Sullivan to Georgia’s Congressional Delegation.

Having recently reached the wizened old age of 65, I found myself in need of supplemental coverage for the mandatory National Government provided Medicare insurance. I use the term mandatory because I was automatically enrolled in Medicare, Part A, which is described as “Hospitalization Coverage.” Interestingly enough, the “Medical Coverage,” or Medicare, Part B is optional, offered by the National Government for a fee of just over $100 monthly.

I was curious as to the “Medical Coverage” available to me through private insurers if I declined Medicare, Part B. After all, in a “Free Market” I should be able to compare the cost of private versus National “Medical Coverage” and make a reasoned decision to choose my personal coverage based on the cost versus benefits various plans offered.

I can’t tell you how surprised I was to find that no reasonable alternatives were offered, even after contacting numerous insurance brokers and insurance companies. It seems that all private companies expect, of course they don’t require you to have Medicare, Part B, but they expect that you will first have obtained “Part B” coverage from the National Government. Several independent insurance brokers said they would obtain a quote from their health lines for medical coverage only and call me, but as yet, none have!

Given that result, I “chose” to purchase Medicare, Part B, from the National Government.

That led to my purchase of “supplemental” insurance coverage, a rational choice considering the lapses and limitations that the National Medicare program had seemingly negotiated with Hospitals and Health Care providers. I chose Aetna, a reputable insurance company with a fine reputation, and enrolled in a PDP policy. As I have yet to need use of the policy, I can only express my hope that Aetna will provide the insurance coverages I might need, at the lowest possible out of pocket cost to me.

The reader will note that I used, in the paragraph above, the phrase “seemingly negotiated” regarding coverages provided by Hospitals and Health Care providers to insured citizens through Medicare, Parts A and B. My subsequent review of the legal relationship between the National Government and those entities providing service reveals that no real negotiations take place, rather, government bureaucrats, under direction from their respective Department Secretaries and the Executive Branch dictate the terms of service and financial remuneration by which all Hospitals and Health Care providers will be governed.

This fact is disappointing to me. Further study indicated that I might also need Medicare Part D, Prescription Drug Coverage, which I found was offered through many of the same Insurance companies who offered Medicare, Parts and B, and whose rates ranged from the high teens to several hundred dollars monthly. I selected a plan through Aetna, and just this week had opportunity to use it. Here, the tale becomes interesting. I visited the pharmacy that I had used in the past, offered the prescription to them, and, yes, asked for the monthly cost. The store, Kroger, placed the cost of a 30 day supply at $38.37. I considered the cost, and declined to have them fill the prescription. I then visited another store, Ingles, and asked the same of them, what will this prescription cost? What? $38.37? Exactly the same as Kroger’s? Isn’t that odd, after all, Campbell’s Cream of Mushroom Soup was priced that very day at $1.00 a can at Kroger’s and $1.68 a can at Ingle’s; the two stores often compete for shoppers on price, they often exhibit characteristics common to a “Free Market.”

In fact, that day each of the five stores I visited offered to fill my prescription at the exact same cost! It would appear that they will charge me whatever the full amount of reimbursement that Aetna’s Medicare Part D coverage allows. Absolutely no competitive marketing paradigm, no free market channel pricing, no consumer competition drives the price of my prescription.

This brings me to my final point. In 2012, health care related cost will reach nearly 20% of GDP! One fifth of all commerce will thus be controlled by factors other than consumer choice. One fifth of all domestic spending will be excluded from “Free Market” economic competition. In point of fact, the health care related economic sector is regulated by government bureaucrats and powerful, government dominated health care cabals, near monopolies acting in concert with national regulators. It is a mixture of the worst possible manifestation of socialism and capitalism, a hybrid fascism that is paternalistic, mendacious, avaricious, and criminal. And, it is, in my opinion, patently unconstitutional and unconscionable, immoral and without Judeo-Christian construct or constraint.

We are all part of this problem, we are all well on our way to Babylon! Medicare, Medicaid, these programs can not be fixed. Government spending may well exceed 40% of GDP this year; this level of spending can not be sustained. We need a revolution, a change of heart, a return to the dark days of 1770, when faithful, godly men and women sought to overturn a corrupt monarch who sought to govern by edit, by coercion, and finally, by force. The American Revolution did not begin in 1776, it did not spring forth full-blown from the firmament, nor from the stirring words written by Thomas Jefferson; it arose from the Blood Spilled in Boston on the Fifth of March, 1770.

It came from the people, a tolerant people, law abiding, resourceful, peace loving, who chafed under taxes imposed by a far away parliament, enacted to raise funds for profligate spending on war and social excess. Theirs was not an absolute monarch, but one whose sway over the legislature was compelling, and whose thumb controlled the profits of the Proprietors and Companies whose lands became “Colonial States” and the revenues of the Royal Colonies in North America. The oppression that resulted in blood spilling on that day was not a result of draconian acts, torture, villainy, or the result of secret police or state sponsored terrorism, the oppression was a result of opposition to tariffs and taxes enacted to pay for a King’s War and a King’s Folly.

And isn’t this what we in America face today? Are we not the victim’s of one President’s Wars and another President’s Folly? And who has been complicit in this gluttony of xenophobic spending? None other than the Congress of the United States, acting and spending as wantonly and foolishly as King George’s Parliament, sheepishly denying our last two Presidents nothing, and failing to stand, as those Minute Men did, and call for an end to economic oppression, misanthropic taxes and unnecessary burdensome spending.

Where were you Senator Chambliss, in this past Presidential campaign? I did not hear your voice calling for support in Georgia for a Conservative candidate in the Republican Primary and I did not see you in one advertisement supporting for your Party’s Nominee for President, Mitt Romney. Was your campaign war chest too empty to share, or too rich to “waste”?

Where would you have been standing on that cold evening in Boston on King Street? Which side would you have taken in 1770, which side will you take now?

Where were you Senator Isakson, in this past Presidential campaign? I did not hear your voice calling for support in Georgia for a Conservative candidate in the Republican Primary. How did you spend your treasure supporting for your Party’s Nominee for President, Mitt Romney? We read what you say you believe in, but we don’t hear your voice. You vote as a conservative, yet you fail to offer alternatives to a bankrupt fiscal policy, and fail to campaign against the seditionists who control the Senate. Not one of you high and mighty Republican Senators campaigned in Nevada against Harry Reid, or against Murray, or Boxer or any of the Fifty plus other spendthrifts who daily plunge ourselves, our children and our grandchildren into unrecoverable debt. I did not hear you in 2012; will you find your voice in 2014?

Where would you have been standing on that cold evening in Boston on King Street? Surely you would have been on the Patriot’s side in 1770, but isn’t it time to step to the front of the milling crowd now? Let us hear your voice!

And what may we expect from the peripatetic campaigning Members of the House of Representatives? You were meant by the Framing Father’s to be our direct voice, the people’s voice, in Congress. The senator’s were meant to express the voice of the State, of State Government, but you are meant to hear the voice of each constituent, to listen to and act upon their needs. There are nine Republicans in the US House from Georgia, all claim to be conservative, but we, the People, hear no voices, see no one in the well, condemning those who are destroying the United States from within. Really, none of you have an opinion of President Obama? None of you can find fault with his nominees? All of you are satisfied with his policies? No, then let us hear it! Buy air time; take a minute to tell us what you really think. Go to your donors and tell them you need a voice, they need a voice; we all need a voice in the great liberal wilderness, Mass Media. Get social Media savvy, recruit youthful experts, form a Georgia Media PAC, start spending, start influencing public opinion. It can be done, Ford, Chrysler, Microsoft, Dell, even Kroger and Ingles do it every day!

So many conservatives claim business backgrounds, claim to be entrepreneurs, and yet fail to realize this is the Sale of your life. What would Dale Carnegie do? Zig Ziglar? Tony Robbins? Surely some of you have read their books, heard their tapes, and viewed their videos!

Where would you have been standing on that cold evening in Boston on King Street?

It that you, ready to bleed for your beliefs, or are you just a bystander, waiting for someone else to bleed for you?

Speak up, Kingston, Westmorland, Price! Call out Woodall, Scott and Collins! Let us hear you Broun, Gingrey, and Graves!

For that matter, Bishop, Johnson, Lewis, Barrow and Scott try thinking for yourself, consider your constituents in 10 or 20 years when there is no more entitlement funds to be had from the National Government, what will your legacy be? One of you stood before the mob, faced down demons, and was a disciple of the bravest Georgian I’ve ever known. That one of you would be first, standing proudly and defiantly before the Tyrant’s men. Where would we find the rest of you?

This year, let us celebrate and commemorate that date, March 5th 1770, the date the Tyrant turned on his people. Let us remember that day’s sacrifice, and pledge our blood to restore freedom, to insure justice, and to preserve our culture. We must restore the first American Revolution; we must be guided by the Founding Father’s courage, wisdom and belief. Let us live our lives as our founding patriots hoped and envisioned we would live.

On March 5th 2013, we must dedicate ourselves to winning the hearts and minds of American’s in November, 2014. There is no other choice, if we can not find compassion in the telling of truth, hope in curbing of spending and equality in the burden of taxation, the conservative cause will be lost.

In a time of turmoil and great strife, in a time of war and extreme partisanship, the first Republican President said well what is so necessary today, “…that the nation shall, under God, have a new birth of freedom.”

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Georgia Politics, National Politics, Southiron Politics | Comments Off on Commentary 2013: Week Two: A Letter from Bull Sullivan to Georgia’s Congressional Delegation.

Commentary 2013: Week One: Rage…Gun Violence in American Culture.

What follows below is a transcript of a dialectic which appeared as a Facebook Group page entry after the December 15, 2012 murder of 26 innocents by a deranged gunman in Sandy Hook, Connecticut. For me, it is the beginning of an analysis that will lead to proposals that are intended to reduce gun violence, not only in schools and public places, but in our American Culture as a whole, especially in urban environments, in what we euphemistically call “street crime.”

The purpose of this commentary, and others to follow, is to begin a dialog, your comments are welcome.

The names of all posters have been removed, only my posts are credited.

Original Post: Male (OPM)

Will some politician be brave enough to address the issue of guns in this country? Or do we wait until another nut kills some more elementary school kids? Mr. President, you’re not running for election and the gun nuts already hate you. Please do something.

Female:

Amen. Even ________, a staunch Republican, believed the lack of gun control in this country was insanity. What is the need for assault rifles outside of soldiers? Bring back the ban!

2nd Male:

There are miles between the position of outlawing gun ownership and the free for all we currently have in the U.S. This is American – the land of the free? We spend trillions to make our country “safe from terrorists” and billions to stop people from driving too fast, but how much is spent to be sure that guns are only owned by responsible people? An how about licensing, education, testing, re-licensing etc as is done with anyone who wants to drive a car, work in a profession, or manage other peoples’ money? Why are Americans afraid to have this discussion? Does the right to kill (or practice killing) trump all other liberties and responsibilities? Only in America…. and the rest of the world must think we’re absolutely nuts.

2nd Male:

Chris Matthews said it well: “it’s not a slippery slope to say that crazy people shouldn’t have weapons”

Bull Sullivan:

While I have never run for public office, I have spent years helping others do so, including serving a then sitting US Senator. I can raise no reasonable argument against the objections that many Americans, including you, have to the possession and criminal misuse of hand guns and assault weapons. Your position is rational and logical; however Federal courts have repeatedly blocked the implementation of “gun control” regulations and likely will continue to do so.

But I would assert to you and others of like mind, that gun control is not the answer to violence, such as we saw today. Senseless unfocused antisocial behavior is a result of mental illness, and I put it to you, that no critical contemporary issue is more ignored and marginalized than mental health. In 1970, Jimmy Carter was elected Governor of Georgia. His wife Rosalynn was the standard bearer for several executive initiatives that were meant to change the policies, procedures and methods of diagnosis and treatment of persons manifesting symptoms indicative of mental instability and illness. I worked at that time as an overnight Psychiatric Evaluation Officer on the 8th Floor Psychiatric Ward of Grady Memorial Hospital. The actions, and resulting legislation championed by Mrs. Carter, and many other Georgians served to energize a generation of mental health professionals, and offered hope that the bleak outcomes of that present time would be improved through expanded screening, improved procedures, decentralized facilities, readily accessible regional care hospitals, neighborhood half-way houses and treatment centers.

The young man who today murdered those children and educators should have been identified as ill and treated as a child and adolescent by similar programs in Connecticut, but sadly, those programs, such as Rosalynn Carter proposed for Georgia, do not exist. What is even sadder is that after 46 years they still do not exist in Georgia!

You see, OPM, society prioritizes its concerns, and Mental Health, as an issue, just doesn’t make the cut. Every incidence extant of recent mass violence against our fellow citizens can be traced to an individual who has presented, prior to the act, a diagnosable and treatable mental illness. (Even 9/11/01 was the result of a delusional hysterical “Conversion Reaction.”)

The laws passed by the Georgia General Assembly to address the horrors of Central State Hospital in Milledgeville, the lack of mental health screening in public schools, the failure to teach and train adequate numbers of mental health professionals, the reticence of teaching facilities, such as Emory and MCG, to revise treatment paradigms and adopt modern non Freudian methodology, all these needed improvements and proposed facilities went essentially unfunded and un-built, because the General Assembly, reflecting the will of the people, did not feel they were a “high” priority.

OPM, even Governor Zell Miller had to propose compromise and finally pass, in 1992, a lottery to fund basic care and education for preschoolers, one of the few successful programs that attempts to intervene in the childhood conditions that often result in adolescent and adult mental illness.

I respect your comment and your opinion, the measured intellect and quiet nature that you demonstrated so many years ago at Marist are evident in your concern, but I would urge you to be more pragmatic, and understand that these are not “evil” people who do these evils acts, but mentally ill persons who could have been diagnosed and treated and healed, if only the will to screen and care for them existed in the public and in their legislators. And understand this, our Culture, our burgeoning population, our fracturing identity will lead to further horrors of Malthusian proportion if we don’t act to care for those in need and educate those in want.

Original Post: Male:

Bull, I am a strong advocate for the mentally ill, but there is no interest in our government to adequately fund what is necessary. Don’t write. Write your legislator. I was board chair of the Helen Ross McNabb center in Knoxville, the finest community mental health center in this country. All I ask for with gun issues is a ban on assault and semi-automatic weapons. Not needed to hunt deer.

Bull Sullivan:

OPM, we share the same passion regarding mental health funding, and I share your sense of outrage and frustration regarding gun control. What is at stake here is political capital. Many Progressives and Conservatives who advocate re-passage of the so called “Federal Assault Weapons Ban” legislation have today called for re-passage, or new legislation achieving the same effect. The previous legislation failed to protect anyone from wounds caused by such weapons. There are literally millions of citizens possessing such guns, I included, and it would be politically and pragmatically impossible to enforce surrender of such weapons. Millions of weapons!

When I see someone of measured voice such as you propose the expenditure of will and effort in a cause doomed to failure, I naturally urge that the same effort be expended to change the minds and hearts of those who can reduce violence, and whose actions could begin to do so immediately. Culture is veering toward chaos, children go begging for care and nurture, and the only answer is “It costs too much”?

If only this outrage, this anger, this pain over the result of failure to properly care for our children’s mental health could be turned to action to properly research, develop and implement solutions that treat the cause of such cruel acts. Would we not all be better off, safer, and less likely to ever again feel such pain on such a scale?

Original Post: Male:

Bull, your response of doing nothing about guns because there are already too many is ludicrous. How about giving up your assault weapons and semi-automatics? Got to start somewhere!

Bull Sullivan:

OPM, I am willing to listen to any proposal that would result in a reduction in the number of privately owned assault weapons. Not only would I listen but I would offer you or any person or group promoting such a proposal my time and talent to effect such a change.

How would such a reduction be accomplished? Would legislation allowing confiscation of privately owned, legally acquired assault weapons pass both Houses of Congress? And if it passed, was signed by the President, and enacted, would the Judiciary rule it constitutional? Perhaps a bill to allow purchase of weapons by the Federal Government from private citizens at market price, a “cash for combat arms” program would be effective. What do you think are the odds of that legislation passing? Some have suggested Federal Legislation requiring registering and licensing all privately owned assault arms, and I have no objection to that, in fact I would support such legislation. However, it is extremely unlikely that Congress would pass such a bill, and again, I fail to see how such legislation would remove even one assault weapon from the body politic.

My opinion is that no legislative remedy is available, that the Second and Fourth Amendments to the Constitution prohibit almost all restrictions on “gun ownership” ex post facto.

Now, consider the private remedy. Are there groups, committees, activists who personally would undertake the purchase of assault weapons? Are there such bodies of citizens who would work, expend energy and effort, and treasure to convince a majority of Americans to support the passage of restrictive legislation? None of note can be found. The groups who claim to be most concerned about violence, most concerned about private ownership of assault weapons spend almost all of their time lobbying Congressmen and almost no time, effort or treasure influencing public opinion. On those rare occasions when the do reach out for public support, their critical and often inflammatory rhetoric “preaches to the choir,” that is, they do so only to raise funds to spend lobbying Congress against the lobbyists for the NRA and other gun groups.

I agree with you that we have “to start somewhere.” Apparently, we believe we should start in different places. I believe if we work to remove the threat, the fear, of criminal behavior by mentally unbalanced, sociopathic and psychopathic and psychotic persons, such as was seen in a small town in Connecticut yesterday, and in Colorado, Arizona and Virginia recently, and in Chicago, Illinois every night, we can persuade our citizens that owning such weapons as assault guns is unnecessary.

As when Congress required registration and licensing of automatic weapons and their owners, so very many years ago, public opinion, not special interests, changed the position of gun advocates in Congress and the Judiciary, so now the opportunity exists to alter public opinion and create a mandate for change.

OPM, I have sold to other private individuals assault weapons that I thought were at best were murderous novelties, and would have willingly sold them to competent legal authority for cash or tax credit, if such existed. I remain armed only because I believe it is the duty of all Americans to be prepared to protect their rights and property from those who would use force to seize them. That duty may extend to privately owning arms, or serving as a member of police or military services, or participating freely in the public discourse over creating a safer America. And that conversation must include not only assault weapons, but physical and mental diseases, impaired driving, high performance automobiles, alcohol and tobacco abuse, domestic violence, physical, emotional and sexual abuse of minors, work place violence, urban crime and the mother lode of all ills, parental incompetence and neglect. But here, having digressed, I am pained to state the obvious, the trite and glib but truthful aphorism: guns don’t kill people, people kill people. Let’s fix the people first, and then guns won’t even be a concern.

+++

 

Posted in FACEBOOK ADHOMS, Georgia Politics, National Politics | Comments Off on Commentary 2013: Week One: Rage…Gun Violence in American Culture.

Georgia’s finest milk…reserved for Pets?

October 2012

In a Hidden Mountain Cove, Gilmer County, Georgia

Dear Mountain Valley Farm:

I just visited your farm store for the first time. What a wonderful store, and such very nice people! It was so neat and clean and hygienic and so well organized. The meat and milk coolers were bright white and immaculate, I did not see even a single fingerprint on the insulated glass doors of the milk coolers. Outstanding! The selection of Dry Aged Grass Fed Beef and Heritage Pork was incredible! And the Wright Family History, the farm and dairy and store located on the same land the family has worked since 1840, how can this be, 172 years later, that you welcome guests with such kindness and hospitality!

And the milk! I want to share a picture of my favorite milk bottle with you. It was posted in a Facebook group of which I am a member, Buckhead Natives. I grew up in an Atlanta neighborhood, Brookwood Hills, and one of the true delights of my childhood was drinking tall cold glasses of R. L. Mathis milk, often three or four times day. Certified, Raw Homogenized Milk powered the children of Atlanta, and I can not recall any child ever becoming ill from drinking raw unpasteurized milk, delivered early in the morning to the doors of thousands of Atlanta Households. How many thousands of quarts did I open and curl on my index finger the rich cream floating just below the bottle’s lid? What a wonderful treat, unknown to the children of today! As a child I drank at least a quart of milk a day, as a high school athlete at Marist School it was nearer a gallon a day! Even now, in my mid sixties, I drink a quart or more of Mayfield Whole Milk daily. And as good  a  milk as Mayfield is, nothing beats the sweet creamy flavor of raw unpasteurized cow milk. Every child, and most adults, should know the pleasure of such rich wholesomeness, but even if we can’t, our pets, Butch, Bumper, Fido, and Sweetie, Simone and Kitty can enjoy the same flavor and health benefits we enjoyed way back in the middle of the last century, thanks to the strict regulation and oversight of the Georgia Department of Agriculture. My pet has almost finished the gallon I bought yesterday at your delightful store, and even now begs for more! And so I offer this photograph to you as a toast to Mountain Valley Farms, for the wonderful memories and your wonderful milk…for my pet, of course.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Georgia’s finest milk…reserved for Pets?