Silent Sam, Silent Southerions

Carol Folt is a Carpetbagger, a Yankee, a pointed headed intellectual of immigrant heritage. Southern Universities, whether Private or State are suffused with such, and they are primarily elevated to positions of high trust and responsibility by fellow travelers, Carpetbaggers and Scalawags, those Southern born apologists,who perpetuate a continual state of Reconstruction and cultural cleansing. 

If you doubt this, I would simply suggest that you gather the names and C.V.’s of the Administrators and Deans of your favorite University, be it Chapel Hill or Charlottesville, be it Sweet Brian or Emory and Henry, or Georgia and Emory, Sewanee or Washington and Lee. Most are not Southern born or bred, most are educated in foreign (outside the Mason Dixon Line) colleges and universities, and most are politically progressive, sexuallly deviant, and spiritually agnostic.

Shock yourself even more: ask to purchase or even peruse a Faculty Directory. Many are unavailable, privacy is cited, many are abridged with salient undergraduate and biographical information omitted or expunged. Did that PhD really spend a year at Patrice Lumumba University? In Moscow? You’ll never know! Most are without a link to the “Scholar’s” Thesis and Dissertation and without reference to published works and papers.

Our cherished Southern Institutions, our Great Universities, the pride and joy of our culture, have been contaminated and desecrated by ruthless and impoverished Euroamerican academics of bourgeois descent and progressive social-democrat inculcation.

These educators are, by and large, at best the fetid ideologues of urban culture and at worst, they are godless idolaters and wonton libertines of permissive and exploitive narcissism and behavioral deviance. They manipulate and cull Southerions, and Southern sympathizers, they wield their power with a bloated tumescent truncheon of arrogance and the presumption of victorious invaders and conquerors. 

Of course, this just my opinion, but ask yourself, who on the faculty of UNC stood up in opposition to these bloviating brigands? Who spoke up for Silent Sam, or for my great great grandfather, Abram Manning, Pvt., Co. D, 3rd Infantry Regiment, North Carolina State Troops, dead at Culp’s Hill, Gettysburg, Penn., on the morning of July 3, 1863? Did none of these “Educators” have an ancestor who fought in the cause of his Sovereign State of North Carolina? If even one member of the UNC faculty had such an ancestor, then I know of one Scalawag Educator unworthy of his or her heritage.

Esse quam videri? If we are now what we seem, then are we no longer what we should be?

Ah, Virginia, Sic semper tyrannis? “Thus always” the spoils of war “to” the “Tyrants,” and death to the memory of honorable men.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Silent Sam, Silent Southerions

Albany Bishop rejects General Convention compromise

Albany bishop rejects General Convention compromise on gay marriage, refuses to allow rites

David Paulsen

Editor, Episcopal News Service

Sir:

Your article on the Bishop of Albany’s actions regarding implementation of Resolution B012 is a thoughtful and just portrayal of the Bishop Love’s position, and the Presiding Bishop’s initial response. Well written, well-conceived, beautifully expressed, fine journalism,  I commend you for your presentation of the comments of those in agreement with the intent of Resolution B012, and the Bishop Love’s heartfelt disagreement with it.  My ordinate was also in disagreement with many of the precepts of the Episcopal Church in his time, and can be said to have been the first American Episcopal Bishop to have departed from the normal denominational practices regarding sexuality and gender. Bishop Pike stoked the fire and was, at his end, consumed by the flames of his apostasy. I realize that the concerns of those whose sexual orientation or gender identity differs from the statistical normalcy of the majority of humans are valid and obvious, and that they have experienced discrimination and even ridicule in pursuit of their happiness.

I only wish to posit one point: that the pursuit of happiness and indeed any state of human fulfillment and satisfaction is not the point of the Gospel, and is not the purview of the Christian Church. Because we failed, institutionally and individually, to share the love of Christ with those whose physical and personality traits diverged, quite naturally, from the majority, should not imply that the contemporary acceptance and even institutional legislation of means and methods to allow these congregants to express their sexual diversity canonically is a righteous act.

In my view the institutional Episcopal Church has merely joined them on an eternal merry-go-round, which will not lead either those desiring acceptance or those offering it, to Eternal Joy.  We should have changed, conformed to the Gospel, and accepted these children of God into our hearts and appropriately into our rites with the same zeal and joy as the Prodigal Father felt for his son. For those who say the Church has changed, has accepted them, I would only ask at what cost?  Bishop Love presents the “traditional” view of marriage, the General Convention, a progressive view. One view must be in error, and the result is the possible condemnation of the souls following one point of view and the potential salvation of the souls following the other.

Faithfully, I believe that Bishop Pike, suffering, lying broken and bloody, dying in the Negev, repented  his apostasy, his alcoholism and his marital indiscretions, and is redeemed. What Wadi’s do the apostates of the present Episcopal Church offer their congregants: where will each of these souls suffer enough pain to purge themselves of the human delusion that man, not God, rules every life?

Human happiness is not the purpose of the Gospel, righteous obedience by the children of creation to the Will and Laws of God is.

God Bless you,

Bull Sullivan

 

Posted in Human Interest, Religious Thought | Comments Off on Albany Bishop rejects General Convention compromise

Mr. Shiver’s Campaign – Part 2

Sir: You are a good and decent man, and have posited many arguments regarding limitations to the 2nd Amendment that are supportable by both demonstrable and anecdotal evidence. Your opinions are intellectually sound and obviously heartfelt, and more than a few are regarded by many conservatives, including myself, as reasonable and worthy of consideration.

But I can not support you because your reasoning, conceived with the best of intentions and expressed with a compassionate mien, is wrapped in the whole cloth of the ideology of Euro-American progressives, disciples of Marx and Engels, proselytizers of Scientific Socialism and its later incarnation in the strident, bitter voices of the progenitors of the Frankfurt School, a refuge of petty, agnostic and perverted academics who, like their contemporaries, the leadership of the current Democratic Party, have nothing in common with the plight of the disenfranchised, the impoverished, the marginal and the ignored.

I can not fathom what leads a man with your education and experience to remain in the Democratic Party, to seek office under its auspices and with its endorsement. No callouses on worn hands, no lines etched by hours in the sun, no unhealed illnesses, no untended hearts in this party’s leaders; most are millionaires, a few are billionaires, and all are wretched in their perceived slights and heavy laden in their superficial guilt. And each of these modern Democrat crusaders for the “common man” have nothing in common with their squires and pages and peons but contempt for those who hold power, whether they be righteous or craven in action, conciliatory or combative in demeanor.

I do not imagine you will win, and in fact, your opponent is also a good and decent man, and likely to be elected. He runs a good office, cares for his constituents and serves them well. I have worked to elect local, state and Federal office holders and view him as an honest and trustworthy man, as I assume you, in elected office, would be. I can not support him either, for he follows the Legacy of Lincoln, Grant, Harding, Coolidge, Nixon, Bush I and Bush 2, that is to say, he is a Republican. I am a Southerner, I am a Conservative, I will not forget.

I hope that you will continue to seek to influence the local electorate, and that you will come to terms with loss, at least, with the loss of this campaign’s election. One other point, in my world, being angry and hateful is a mental illness, for healthy humans seek peace and prosperity, it’s in their self-interest to do so. We live in world gone mad with violence, in games, cinema, videos, in the arts and in a good portion of science. Wouldn’t it be great if someone invented a game that blew things together, cannons aimed at empty lots that blew houses to piece, to wholeness, rifles that cured illnesses, and handguns that strew stitches on injured flesh.

Yes, MADD has made a difference, but what freedom or right would be violated if every vehicle had a Drug and Etoh interlock? If vehicle speed was electronically limited to the displayed speed limit? If people were tested on rules of the road, and if Driver’s Ed was “For Real?’ How about traffic law violators forgoing a fine, and rather, having their car impounded for weeks, or months? There is no Amendment protecting Drivers Rights, and technology exists to end 99% of all automobile deaths and injuries within a generation, but…

Just thoughts for you, and best wishes, and God’s Blessings on you and yours. I’ll be praying His will is done today, won’t you join me in that prayer?

Posted in Georgia Politics, National Politics, Southiron Politics | Comments Off on Mr. Shiver’s Campaign – Part 2